For
Emerson Man is the center of the Universe. Everything that surrounds him exists
for him to study, understand, modify and rule according to his visions of
perfection. In the essay ‘The American Scholar’ he questions- ‘Is not, indeed,
every man a student, and do not all things exist for the student’s behoof?’ In
addition to that he asks- ‘Is not the true scholar the only master?’- asserting that everything exists for Man and that
he is the master of everything.
Initially in the essay he describes Nature as something that is beyond the human capacity to comprehend and control. He says that it has no beginning, no end and is ‘so entire, so boundless’. He further says:‘Far too as her splendors shine, system upon system shooting like rays, upward, downward, without center, without circumference.’Then he says that ‘Nature hastens to render accounts of herself to the mind’. The sentence implies that the human mind has the potential to study and understand Nature despite its vastness and boundlessness. He explains that the human mind accumulates and organizes the facts it observes into categories. It then studies them in relation to each other and finds a single unifying principle underlying all of them. Once Man is in possession of this principle he can master and control everything. What Emerson is suggesting here is that Man can bring order and harmony to what is disconnected and chaotic. He says that the beauty of Nature is the beauty of the Human Mind and Nature’s law is that of the Human Mind. This implies that order and beauty are not what Nature has but what we give to it or what we make of it. He says that by studying Nature we know ourselves. In other words by studying Nature we become aware of our own power to master and control Nature. Emerson does not just stop with mastering and controlling nature. He says that Man can even recreate Nature and become the creator (‘...the natural philosophy that now is, is only the first groupings of its gigantic hand, he shall look forward to an ever expanding knowledge as to a becoming creator.’).
Hence
in short The American Scholar is a man of Ambition; ambitious for power and
supremacy. It is the emergence of this kind of scholar that the rest of the
world is anxious about because power over Nature also gives power over men. Emerson
himself states- ‘He who has mastered any law in his private thoughts, is master
to that extent of all men whose language he speaks, and of all into whose
language his own can be translated.’ Hawthorne’s short story ‘The Birthmark’ is
an attempt to subvert this power. The text expresses the anxiety Men of Science
aroused among the common public.Hawthorne
in a way praises Men of Science and gives an indication of the power they hold
but the very next instant he takes away his acknowledgement of their power and
all the credit he gives them. He does this giving and taking away of praise throughout
the text.He
says – ‘...pursuits which, as some of their ardent votaries believed, would
ascend from one step of powerful intelligence to another, until perhaps the
philosopher should lay his hand on the secrete of creative forces and perhaps
make new worlds for himself.’ He does not say that the pursuit of Science gives
such a power. He only says that the ‘ardent votaries believed’ that they have
such a power. Similarly when he mentions the Alchemists he says that they
‘perhaps imagined themselves to have acquired from the study of Nature a power
above Nature, and from physics a sway over the spiritual world.’ Hawthorne is
condescendingly hinting that they do not really have such a power, they only
think they have.He
praises Aylmer saying that even ‘the veriest clod of earth assumed a soul’ in
his hand. The very next instant he says that ‘his most splendid successes were
almost invariably failures’, that ‘his brightest diamonds were the merest
pebbles compared to the inestimable gems which lay hidden beyond his reach’. Emerson
depicts Nature as something that can be conquered despite its vastness and
boundlessness. According to Hawthorne Nature is a thing that can never be fully
understood and conquered despite the best of efforts. It is beyond Man’s grasp.
He says- ‘our great creative Mother, while she amuses us with apparently
working in the broad sunshine, is yet severely careful to keep her own
secretes, and inspite of her pretended openness; shows us only results.’Georgiana
after going through the records of his experiments, admires and
worships him only for his high and noble ideals and visions and is not
confident about his success (....reverenced Aylmer and loved him more
profoundly than ever, but with a less entire dependence on his judgement than
heretofore).Most
of Aylmer’s inventions and creations are described as ephemeral and tenuous as
the airy figures, bodiless ideas and forms of unsubstantial beauty with which
he entertains Georgiana and the beautiful plant which burns and turns to ashes
with a touch. They are also dangerous as the poison that looks as beautiful as
the Elixir Vitae and the lotion that removes freckles but which can also take
blood out of the cheek leaving it dead pale with a stronger profusion. Here
science is presented as something that causes more harm than good.In
this story Hawthorne is negating the scientist’s obsession with perfection, his
high and noble standards and his attempts to achieve them. He is trying to
undermine these attempts as vain and the results as unnatural and therefore
undesirable. For this reason he presents
Aminadab in opposition to Aylmer.Aminadab
is crude and simple as opposed to Aylmer- a man of intellectual brilliance. Aminadab
remains as he is, as how Nature has destined him to be. He does not rise above
his stature. He is a man who thrives on what Nature provides him. He remains
content with it and is grateful towards Nature for it. This is why he says, ‘If
she were my wife, I’d never part with that birthmark.’Aylmer
does not remain as a part of Nature like Aminadab, being provided by it like
other creatures in Nature. He stands apart from it and above it by moulding it
according to his visions. But in pursuit of his ideals and visions of
perfection he loses ‘the best the earth could offer’. After all his efforts he
remains as a failure. In the end it is Aminadab who despite his lack of
intellect stands triumphant. He (being a part of Nature) laughs celebrating the
victory of Nature over Human Intellect. The end achieves the goal the text has
set out to achieve. It has successfully subverted the power of Human Intellect,
restoring Nature’s supremacy.
Initially in the essay he describes Nature as something that is beyond the human capacity to comprehend and control. He says that it has no beginning, no end and is ‘so entire, so boundless’. He further says:‘Far too as her splendors shine, system upon system shooting like rays, upward, downward, without center, without circumference.’Then he says that ‘Nature hastens to render accounts of herself to the mind’. The sentence implies that the human mind has the potential to study and understand Nature despite its vastness and boundlessness. He explains that the human mind accumulates and organizes the facts it observes into categories. It then studies them in relation to each other and finds a single unifying principle underlying all of them. Once Man is in possession of this principle he can master and control everything. What Emerson is suggesting here is that Man can bring order and harmony to what is disconnected and chaotic. He says that the beauty of Nature is the beauty of the Human Mind and Nature’s law is that of the Human Mind. This implies that order and beauty are not what Nature has but what we give to it or what we make of it. He says that by studying Nature we know ourselves. In other words by studying Nature we become aware of our own power to master and control Nature. Emerson does not just stop with mastering and controlling nature. He says that Man can even recreate Nature and become the creator (‘...the natural philosophy that now is, is only the first groupings of its gigantic hand, he shall look forward to an ever expanding knowledge as to a becoming creator.’).
Hawthorne
however does not advocate the cessation of all scientific progress. He suggests
that Science must not hurry up and force facts out of Nature. They must wait
for Nature to reveal herself. To find ‘a perfect future in the present’ is not
a good idea. What is objectionable about science to Hawthorne is it being a
medium of attaining Individual desire for power or for fulfilling Individual
whims. Emerson views individual progress as a key to National progress. He
urges the Individual to trust his own mind and follow his convictions (what may
be for Hawthorne a whim) no matter what the popular opinion is. He says- ‘the
deeper he dives into his privatest, secretest presentiment, to his wonder he
finds, this is the most acceptable, most public and universally true.’